Preseason
MatchesRankingsPrompts
GitHub
Preseason
MatchesRankingsPromptsMethodologyContact

© 2026 Preseason. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
@betocmn
Testing
Methodology

Cypress vs Vitest

CypressCYCypressvsVitestVIVitest
CypressVitest
45%
55%

Leading: Vitest (54.5%)

Insufficient data
This matchup has 22 decisive cases (minimum 30 required for publication).

Statistics

MetricValue
Cypress wins10
Vitest wins12
Abstains (no tool)145
Other tool chosen311
Decisive cases22
Cypress win rate (unweighted)45.5%
95% CI26.9% - 65.3%
Cypress win rate (weighted)45.5%

Comments

Cypress

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Vitest

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Model range breakdown

Model rangeTierCypressVitestNoneOtherA rate
DeepSeek Flash 3.2–4.1Mid072160%
DeepSeek Pro 4–4 0813Frontier00817n/a
DeepSeek R1Frontier00202n/a
DevstralMid50214100%
Gemini Flash 2.5–3.8Small00522n/a
Gemini Pro 2.5–3.1 PreviewFrontier00620n/a
GLM 5 Turbo–5.3Frontier00522n/a
GPT 5.4–6 AstraFrontier00518n/a
GPT Coding 5.3 Codex–6.1 SolFrontier00618n/a
GPT Mini 5.4 Mini–6 LunaMid001116n/a
HaikuSmall00126n/a
Kimi 2.5–3Frontier001112n/a
Llama MaverickFrontier00126n/a
Llama ScoutSmall50120100%
MiMo Pro 2–2.6Frontier001510n/a
MiniMax M 2.7–3Frontier00125n/a
Mistral SmallMid00411n/a
Opus 4.6–5.5Frontier00720n/a
Qwen CoderMid00146n/a
Sonnet 4.6–5.5Frontier059100%

Per-prompt breakdown

PromptTierCypressVitestNoneOtherA rate
ai-engineering-workflowIntermediate692213040%
ai-engineering-workflowBeginner13997525%
ai-engineering-workflowAdvanced3024106100%