LLM Observability

HoneyHive vs PostHog

HoneyHivePostHog

33%

67%

Leading: PostHog (66.7%)

Insufficient data

This matchup has 3 decisive cases (minimum 30 required for publication).

Metric	Value
HoneyHive wins	1
PostHog wins	2
Abstains (no tool)	159
Other tool chosen	4427
Decisive cases	3
HoneyHive win rate (unweighted)	33.3%
95% CI	6.1% - 79.2%
HoneyHive win rate (weighted)	33.3%

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Model range	Tier	HoneyHive	PostHog	None	Other	A rate
DeepSeek Flash 3.2–4.1	Mid	0	0	4	235	n/a
DeepSeek Pro 4–4 0813	Frontier	0	0	1	107	n/a
DeepSeek R1	Frontier	0	0	2	238	n/a
Devstral	Mid	0	0	29	180	n/a
Gemini Flash 2.5–3.8	Small	0	0	4	236	n/a
Gemini Pro 2.5–3.1 Preview	Frontier	0	0	9	231	n/a
GLM 5 Turbo–5.3	Frontier	0	0	0	240	n/a
GPT 5.4–6 Astra	Frontier	0	0	5	235	n/a
GPT Coding 5.3 Codex–6.1 Sol	Frontier	0	0	2	238	n/a
GPT Mini 5.4 Mini–6 Luna	Mid	0	2	6	232	0%
Haiku	Small	0	0	3	233	n/a
Kimi 2.5–3	Frontier	0	0	4	222	n/a
Llama Maverick	Frontier	0	0	17	221	n/a
Llama Scout	Small	0	0	36	186	n/a
MiMo Pro 2–2.6	Frontier	0	0	8	232	n/a
MiniMax M 2.7–3	Frontier	0	0	5	232	n/a
Mistral Small	Mid	1	0	4	230	100%
Opus 4.6–5.5	Frontier	0	0	9	231	n/a
Qwen Coder	Mid	0	0	2	237	n/a
Sonnet 4.6–5.5	Frontier	0	0	9	231	n/a

Prompt	Tier	HoneyHive	PostHog	None	Other	A rate
ai-support-agent-platform	Beginner	0	2	17	570	0%
ai-agent-application	Advanced	1	0	0	174	100%
ai-agent-application	Beginner	0	0	27	151	n/a
ai-agent-application	Intermediate	0	0	1	174	n/a
ai-engineering-workflow	Advanced	0	0	0	173	n/a
ai-engineering-workflow	Beginner	0	0	74	104	n/a
ai-engineering-workflow	Intermediate	0	0	0	177	n/a
ai-revenue-ops-copilot	Intermediate	0	0	1	577	n/a
ai-revenue-ops-copilot	Beginner	0	0	34	561	n/a
ai-revenue-ops-copilot	Advanced	0	0	3	582	n/a
ai-support-agent-platform	Intermediate	0	0	1	593	n/a
ai-support-agent-platform	Advanced	0	0	1	591	n/a