Preseason
MatchesRankingsPrompts
GitHub
Preseason
MatchesRankingsPromptsMethodologyContact

© 2026 Preseason. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
@betocmn
Agentic IDE / ADEs
Methodology

Tabby vs OpenHands

TATabbyvsOpenHandsOPOpenHands
TabbyOpenHands
40%
60%

Leading: OpenHands (60.0%)

Insufficient data
This matchup has 5 decisive cases (minimum 30 required for publication).

Statistics

MetricValue
Tabby wins2
OpenHands wins3
Abstains (no tool)963
Other tool chosen3021
Decisive cases5
Tabby win rate (unweighted)40.0%
95% CI11.8% - 76.9%
Tabby win rate (weighted)40.0%

Comments

Tabby

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

OpenHands

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Model range breakdown

Model rangeTierTabbyOpenHandsNoneOtherA rate
DeepSeek Flash 3.2–4.1Mid0067141n/a
DeepSeek Pro 4–4 0813Frontier001368n/a
DeepSeek R1Frontier0074139n/a
DevstralMid0070117n/a
Gemini Flash 2.5–3.8Small0075131n/a
Gemini Pro 2.5–3.1 PreviewFrontier0022186n/a
GLM 5 Turbo–5.3Frontier004208n/a
GPT 5.4–6 AstraFrontier01371710%
GPT Coding 5.3 Codex–6.1 SolFrontier01291790%
GPT Mini 5.4 Mini–6 LunaMid0192010%
HaikuSmall0091107n/a
Kimi 2.5–3Frontier0059139n/a
Llama MaverickFrontier0075135n/a
Llama ScoutSmall0058136n/a
MiMo Pro 2–2.6Frontier0043170n/a
MiniMax M 2.7–3Frontier0029180n/a
Mistral SmallMid0077110n/a
Opus 4.6–5.5Frontier0029184n/a
Qwen CoderMid2025183100%
Sonnet 4.6–5.5Frontier0077136n/a

Per-prompt breakdown

PromptTierTabbyOpenHandsNoneOtherA rate
ai-engineering-workflowAdvanced21114967%
ai-support-agent-platformAdvanced0215760%
ai-engineering-workflowBeginner000173n/a
ai-engineering-workflowIntermediate000171n/a
ai-revenue-ops-copilotIntermediate002575n/a
ai-revenue-ops-copilotBeginner00307285n/a
ai-revenue-ops-copilotAdvanced008549n/a
ai-support-agent-platformIntermediate00277315n/a
ai-support-agent-platformBeginner00367228n/a