Preseason
MatchesRankingsPrompts
GitHub
Preseason
MatchesRankingsPromptsMethodologyContact

© 2026 Preseason. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
@betocmn
Background Jobs / Queues
Methodology

Inngest vs BullMQ

InngestINInngestvsBullMQBUBullMQ
InngestBullMQ
30%
70%

Leading: BullMQ (69.6%)

Insufficient data
This matchup has 23 decisive cases (minimum 30 required for publication).

Statistics

MetricValue
Inngest wins7
BullMQ wins16
Abstains (no tool)0
Other tool chosen27
Decisive cases23
Inngest win rate (unweighted)30.4%
95% CI15.6% - 50.9%
Inngest win rate (weighted)30.4%

Comments

Inngest

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

BullMQ

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Per-model breakdown

ModelTierInngestBullMQNoneOtherA rate
GLM 5.2Frontier210067%
MiniMax M3Frontier2001100%
DeepSeek V4 ProFrontier110150%
Gemini 3.5 FlashSmall110150%
Claude Opus 4.8Frontier02010%
GPT 5.4 MiniMid02000%
Kimi K2.7 CodeFrontier02010%
GPT 5.5Frontier1001100%
Claude Sonnet 4.6Frontier01020%
Devstral 2 2512Mid01010%
Gemini 2.5 ProFrontier01010%
GPT 5.3 CodexFrontier01020%
MiMo V2.5 ProFrontier01020%
Mistral Small 4Mid01010%
Qwen3 Coder NextMid01010%
Claude Haiku 4.5Small0003n/a
DeepSeek R1 0528Frontier0003n/a
DeepSeek V4 FlashMid0002n/a
Llama 4 MaverickFrontier0001n/a
Llama 4 ScoutSmall0002n/a

Per-prompt breakdown

PromptTierInngestBullMQNoneOtherA rate
full-stack-web-appIntermediate380627%
full-stack-web-appAdvanced180811%
full-stack-web-appBeginner30013100%