Preseason
MatchesRankingsPrompts
GitHub
Preseason
MatchesRankingsPromptsMethodologyContact

© 2026 Preseason. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
@betocmn
Background Jobs / Queues
Methodology

Celery vs BullMQ

CECeleryvsBullMQBUBullMQ
CeleryBullMQ
54%
46%

Leading: Celery (54.4%)

Statistics

MetricValue
Celery wins131
BullMQ wins110
Abstains (no tool)3
Other tool chosen108
Decisive cases241
Celery win rate (unweighted)54.4%
95% CI48.0% - 60.5%
Celery win rate (weighted)54.4%

Comments

Celery

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

BullMQ

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Per-model breakdown

ModelTierCeleryBullMQNoneOtherA rate
Claude Opus 4.8Frontier10110048%
Claude Sonnet 4.6Frontier9110045%
DeepSeek R1 0528Frontier1540179%
MiMo V2.5 ProFrontier1450274%
Gemini 3.5 FlashSmall790544%
Claude Haiku 4.5Small1310793%
DeepSeek V4 ProFrontier860757%
GPT 5.3 CodexFrontier1030877%
Gemini 2.5 ProFrontier582438%
DeepSeek V4 FlashMid830273%
Devstral 2 2512Mid650155%
GPT 5.4 MiniMid381527%
Qwen3 Coder NextMid010040%
Llama 4 ScoutSmall9002100%
Llama 4 MaverickFrontier630067%
GLM 5.2Frontier1701313%
Kimi K2.7 CodeFrontier1701113%
GPT 5.5Frontier430957%
Mistral Small 4Mid05090%
MiniMax M3Frontier2101867%

Per-prompt breakdown

PromptTierCeleryBullMQNoneOtherA rate
full-stack-web-appIntermediate395912140%
full-stack-web-appBeginner76903789%
full-stack-web-appAdvanced164225028%