Preseason
MatchesRankingsPrompts
GitHub
Preseason
MatchesRankingsPromptsMethodologyContact

© 2026 Preseason. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
@betocmn
Background Jobs / Queues
Methodology

Celery vs BullMQ

CECeleryvsBullMQBUBullMQ
CeleryBullMQ
57%
43%

Leading: Celery (56.8%)

Statistics

MetricValue
Celery wins21
BullMQ wins16
Abstains (no tool)0
Other tool chosen13
Decisive cases37
Celery win rate (unweighted)56.8%
95% CI40.9% - 71.3%
Celery win rate (weighted)56.8%

Comments

Celery

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

BullMQ

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Per-model breakdown

ModelTierCeleryBullMQNoneOtherA rate
DeepSeek R1 0528Frontier3000100%
Claude Sonnet 4.6Frontier210067%
MiMo V2.5 ProFrontier210067%
Claude Opus 4.8Frontier120033%
Kimi K2.7 CodeFrontier120033%
Claude Haiku 4.5Small2001100%
DeepSeek V4 FlashMid2000100%
DeepSeek V4 ProFrontier110150%
Devstral 2 2512Mid110050%
Gemini 2.5 ProFrontier110050%
Gemini 3.5 FlashSmall110150%
GPT 5.3 CodexFrontier110150%
GPT 5.4 MiniMid02000%
Llama 4 MaverickFrontier1000100%
Llama 4 ScoutSmall1001100%
MiniMax M3Frontier1002100%
GLM 5.2Frontier01020%
Mistral Small 4Mid01010%
Qwen3 Coder NextMid01010%
GPT 5.5Frontier0002n/a

Per-prompt breakdown

PromptTierCeleryBullMQNoneOtherA rate
full-stack-web-appIntermediate680343%
full-stack-web-appBeginner12004100%
full-stack-web-appAdvanced380627%