Preseason
MatchesRankingsPrompts
GitHub
Preseason
MatchesRankingsPromptsMethodologyContact

© 2026 Preseason. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
@betocmn
Background Jobs / Queues
Methodology

Celery vs BullMQ

CECeleryvsBullMQBUBullMQ
CeleryBullMQ
55%
45%

Leading: Celery (55.4%)

Statistics

MetricValue
Celery wins175
BullMQ wins141
Abstains (no tool)3
Other tool chosen175
Decisive cases316
Celery win rate (unweighted)55.4%
95% CI49.9% - 60.8%
Celery win rate (weighted)55.4%

Comments

Celery

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

BullMQ

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Model range breakdown

Model rangeTierCeleryBullMQNoneOtherA rate
DeepSeek Flash 3.2–4.1Mid860557%
DeepSeek Pro 4–4 0813Frontier10100750%
DeepSeek R1Frontier2040383%
DevstralMid1050367%
Gemini Flash 2.5–3.8Small8120740%
Gemini Pro 2.5–3.1 PreviewFrontier5102933%
GLM 5 Turbo–5.3Frontier3901525%
GPT 5.4–6 AstraFrontier9301475%
GPT Coding 5.3 Codex–6.1 SolFrontier1530883%
GPT Mini 5.4 Mini–6 LunaMid781747%
HaikuSmall1710994%
Kimi 2.5–3Frontier31001323%
Llama MaverickFrontier7301070%
Llama ScoutSmall100013100%
MiMo Pro 2–2.6Frontier1690264%
MiniMax M 2.7–3Frontier2202350%
Mistral SmallMid070190%
Opus 4.6–5.5Frontier12140146%
Qwen CoderMid012060%
Sonnet 4.6–5.5Frontier13130150%

Per-prompt breakdown

PromptTierCeleryBullMQNoneOtherA rate
full-stack-web-appIntermediate547514442%
full-stack-web-appBeginner99906392%
full-stack-web-appAdvanced225726828%