Preseason
MatchesRankingsPrompts
GitHub
Preseason
MatchesRankingsPromptsMethodologyContact

© 2026 Preseason. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
@betocmn
Background Jobs / Queues
Methodology

Celery vs BullMQ

CECeleryvsBullMQBUBullMQ
CeleryBullMQ
56%
44%

Leading: Celery (55.9%)

Statistics

MetricValue
Celery wins118
BullMQ wins93
Abstains (no tool)3
Other tool chosen94
Decisive cases211
Celery win rate (unweighted)55.9%
95% CI49.2% - 62.5%
Celery win rate (weighted)55.9%

Comments

Celery

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

BullMQ

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Per-model breakdown

ModelTierCeleryBullMQNoneOtherA rate
Claude Opus 4.8Frontier990050%
DeepSeek R1 0528Frontier1430182%
MiMo V2.5 ProFrontier1250171%
Claude Sonnet 4.6Frontier890047%
Gemini 3.5 FlashSmall680443%
Claude Haiku 4.5Small1110692%
DeepSeek V4 ProFrontier750658%
GPT 5.3 CodexFrontier830773%
Devstral 2 2512Mid650155%
Gemini 2.5 ProFrontier562345%
DeepSeek V4 FlashMid730270%
Llama 4 ScoutSmall9002100%
Llama 4 MaverickFrontier630067%
GPT 5.4 MiniMid271522%
Qwen3 Coder NextMid08030%
GLM 5.2Frontier1601114%
Kimi K2.7 CodeFrontier160914%
GPT 5.5Frontier420867%
Mistral Small 4Mid04090%
MiniMax M3Frontier20016100%

Per-prompt breakdown

PromptTierCeleryBullMQNoneOtherA rate
full-stack-web-appIntermediate364911842%
full-stack-web-appBeginner67903188%
full-stack-web-appAdvanced153524530%