Preseason
MatchesRankingsPrompts
GitHub
Preseason
MatchesRankingsPromptsMethodologyContact

© 2026 Preseason. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
@betocmn
Background Jobs / Queues
Methodology

BullMQ vs Celery

BullMQBUBullMQvsCECelery
BullMQCelery
43%
57%

Leading: Celery (56.8%)

Statistics

MetricValue
BullMQ wins16
Celery wins21
Abstains (no tool)0
Other tool chosen13
Decisive cases37
BullMQ win rate (unweighted)43.2%
95% CI28.7% - 59.1%
BullMQ win rate (weighted)43.2%

Comments

BullMQ

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Celery

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Per-model breakdown

ModelTierBullMQCeleryNoneOtherA rate
Claude Opus 4.8Frontier210067%
Kimi K2.7 CodeFrontier210067%
Claude Sonnet 4.6Frontier120033%
MiMo V2.5 ProFrontier120033%
DeepSeek R1 0528Frontier03000%
GPT 5.4 MiniMid2000100%
DeepSeek V4 ProFrontier110150%
Devstral 2 2512Mid110050%
Gemini 2.5 ProFrontier110050%
Gemini 3.5 FlashSmall110150%
GPT 5.3 CodexFrontier110150%
Claude Haiku 4.5Small02010%
DeepSeek V4 FlashMid02000%
GLM 5.2Frontier1002100%
Mistral Small 4Mid1001100%
Qwen3 Coder NextMid1001100%
Llama 4 MaverickFrontier01000%
Llama 4 ScoutSmall01010%
MiniMax M3Frontier01020%
GPT 5.5Frontier0002n/a

Per-prompt breakdown

PromptTierBullMQCeleryNoneOtherA rate
full-stack-web-appIntermediate860357%
full-stack-web-appBeginner012040%
full-stack-web-appAdvanced830673%