Preseason
MatchesRankingsPrompts
GitHub
Preseason
MatchesRankingsPromptsMethodologyContact

© 2026 Preseason. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
@betocmn
Background Jobs / Queues
Methodology

BullMQ vs Celery

BullMQBUBullMQvsCECelery
BullMQCelery
45%
55%

Leading: Celery (55.4%)

Statistics

MetricValue
BullMQ wins141
Celery wins175
Abstains (no tool)3
Other tool chosen175
Decisive cases316
BullMQ win rate (unweighted)44.6%
95% CI39.2% - 50.1%
BullMQ win rate (weighted)44.6%

Comments

BullMQ

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Celery

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Model range breakdown

Model rangeTierBullMQCeleryNoneOtherA rate
DeepSeek Flash 3.2–4.1Mid680543%
DeepSeek Pro 4–4 0813Frontier10100750%
DeepSeek R1Frontier4200317%
DevstralMid5100333%
Gemini Flash 2.5–3.8Small1280760%
Gemini Pro 2.5–3.1 PreviewFrontier1052967%
GLM 5 Turbo–5.3Frontier9301575%
GPT 5.4–6 AstraFrontier3901425%
GPT Coding 5.3 Codex–6.1 SolFrontier3150817%
GPT Mini 5.4 Mini–6 LunaMid871753%
HaikuSmall117096%
Kimi 2.5–3Frontier10301377%
Llama MaverickFrontier3701030%
Llama ScoutSmall0100130%
MiMo Pro 2–2.6Frontier9160236%
MiniMax M 2.7–3Frontier2202350%
Mistral SmallMid70019100%
Opus 4.6–5.5Frontier14120154%
Qwen CoderMid12006100%
Sonnet 4.6–5.5Frontier13130150%

Per-prompt breakdown

PromptTierBullMQCeleryNoneOtherA rate
full-stack-web-appIntermediate755414458%
full-stack-web-appBeginner9990638%
full-stack-web-appAdvanced572226872%