Preseason
MatchesRankingsPrompts
GitHub
Preseason
MatchesRankingsPromptsMethodologyContact

© 2026 Preseason. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
@betocmn
Background Jobs / Queues
Methodology

BullMQ vs Celery

BullMQBUBullMQvsCECelery
BullMQCelery
46%
54%

Leading: Celery (54.4%)

Statistics

MetricValue
BullMQ wins110
Celery wins131
Abstains (no tool)3
Other tool chosen108
Decisive cases241
BullMQ win rate (unweighted)45.6%
95% CI39.5% - 52.0%
BullMQ win rate (weighted)45.6%

Comments

BullMQ

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Celery

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Per-model breakdown

ModelTierBullMQCeleryNoneOtherA rate
Claude Opus 4.8Frontier11100052%
Claude Sonnet 4.6Frontier1190055%
MiMo V2.5 ProFrontier5140226%
DeepSeek R1 0528Frontier4150121%
Gemini 3.5 FlashSmall970556%
DeepSeek V4 ProFrontier680743%
Claude Haiku 4.5Small113077%
Gemini 2.5 ProFrontier852462%
GPT 5.3 CodexFrontier3100823%
GPT 5.4 MiniMid831573%
Devstral 2 2512Mid560145%
DeepSeek V4 FlashMid380227%
Qwen3 Coder NextMid10004100%
Llama 4 MaverickFrontier360033%
Llama 4 ScoutSmall09020%
GLM 5.2Frontier7101388%
Kimi K2.7 CodeFrontier7101188%
GPT 5.5Frontier340943%
Mistral Small 4Mid5009100%
MiniMax M3Frontier1201833%

Per-prompt breakdown

PromptTierBullMQCeleryNoneOtherA rate
full-stack-web-appIntermediate593912160%
full-stack-web-appBeginner97603711%
full-stack-web-appAdvanced421625072%