Preseason
MatchesRankingsPrompts
GitHub
Preseason
MatchesRankingsPromptsMethodologyContact

© 2026 Preseason. All rights reserved.

PrivacyTerms
@betocmn
Background Jobs / Queues
Methodology

BullMQ vs Celery

BullMQBUBullMQvsCECelery
BullMQCelery
44%
56%

Leading: Celery (55.9%)

Statistics

MetricValue
BullMQ wins93
Celery wins118
Abstains (no tool)3
Other tool chosen94
Decisive cases211
BullMQ win rate (unweighted)44.1%
95% CI37.5% - 50.8%
BullMQ win rate (weighted)44.1%

Comments

BullMQ

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Celery

No comments yet

Verified critics can leave comments here.

Per-model breakdown

ModelTierBullMQCeleryNoneOtherA rate
Claude Opus 4.8Frontier990050%
Claude Sonnet 4.6Frontier980053%
MiMo V2.5 ProFrontier5120129%
DeepSeek R1 0528Frontier3140118%
Gemini 3.5 FlashSmall860457%
DeepSeek V4 ProFrontier570642%
Claude Haiku 4.5Small111068%
Gemini 2.5 ProFrontier652355%
Devstral 2 2512Mid560145%
GPT 5.3 CodexFrontier380727%
DeepSeek V4 FlashMid370230%
GPT 5.4 MiniMid721578%
Llama 4 MaverickFrontier360033%
Llama 4 ScoutSmall09020%
Qwen3 Coder NextMid8003100%
GLM 5.2Frontier6101186%
Kimi K2.7 CodeFrontier610986%
GPT 5.5Frontier240833%
Mistral Small 4Mid4009100%
MiniMax M3Frontier020160%

Per-prompt breakdown

PromptTierBullMQCeleryNoneOtherA rate
full-stack-web-appIntermediate493611858%
full-stack-web-appBeginner96703112%
full-stack-web-appAdvanced351524570%